- Claimant
- ОСОБА_1 — house customer
- Defendant
- Maksym Ahafonov (Агафонов Максим Сергійович)
- Contract
- № 09122021 · 09.12.2021
- Subject
- MODODOMUS S168 house, foundation and installation
- Advance paid
- 100 000 EUR (3 168 000 UAH)
- Delivery deadline
- 25.08.2022
The defendant is named in the public record of proceedings No. 22-ц/818/1953/25. The claimant is identified in this dossier as ОСОБА_1.
Data-UA · parties in case No. 953/5664/22 S12Payment and non-performance established by the court
The Kharkiv Court of Appeal ruling of 15 October 2025 expressly found that the customer paid the advance and the contractor failed to perform by the agreed deadline. The court noted that the defendant did not deny non-performance.
Receipt of the money is supported by signed acknowledgements. The ruling cites the handwriting expert’s finding of 19 April 2024 that the defendant signed the payment acknowledgements himself.
Kharkiv Court of Appeal · No. 131028646 S11The principal award remains in force
The appeal upheld termination and repayment of 100 000 EUR (3 168 000 UAH). On 1 July 2026, the Supreme Court set aside only the parts concerning the late-payment penalty, fine, inflation losses and 3% annual interest, together with the supplementary ruling on costs.
| Claim | Appeal · 15 October 2025 | After cassation · 1 July 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Principal | 100 000 EUR (3 168 000 UAH) | Award not overturned |
| Contractual fine | 452 500 UAH | Rehearing |
| Inflation losses | 333 454,43 UAH | Rehearing |
| 3% annual interest | 123 161,43 UAH | Rehearing |
| Late-payment penalty | Claim dismissed | Dismissal set aside; rehearing |
The defendant’s position and the court’s assessment
The defendant invoked hostilities and destruction of a materials warehouse as force majeure, and said he was willing to perform within a new timeframe. The ruling quotes police and emergency service responses: they had no record of a shell hitting the stated address during the relevant period. The appeal upheld termination and repayment of the advance.
Kharkiv Court of Appeal · No. 131028646 S11Rehearing scheduled for 25 November 2026
After cassation, the case was transferred to the Poltava Court of Appeal. Its order of 31 August 2026 scheduled a hearing for 25 November. The order of 26 October permits the claimant’s representative to participate by video and repeats that date.
This is the procedural status as of 5 November 2026. No outcome of the rehearing was published in the materials examined.
Poltava Court of Appeal · No. 139333723 S14 Poltava Court of Appeal · No. 140920470 S15Case documents
Full texts are available on Opendatabot, iPlex and Protocol. The official Ukrainian register was inaccessible through the viewing tool; the links lead to public copies. The debtor under this contract is an individual who contracted as an entrepreneur. The Czech and Cypriot companies are not named as defendants in this case.