INDEPENDENT PUBLIC DOSSIER

EDITION 02 / 5 NOVEMBER 2026

MODODOMUSCustomer Reviews

House paid for.
House not delivered.
Court ordered repayment.

Maksym Ahafonov received 100 000 EUR (3 168 000 UAH) for a MODODOMUS S168 house and failed to perform the contract. The court terminated the contract and ordered him to return the advance.

Independent information project. Not Mododomus’s official website.
CASE No. 953/5664/22
UKRAINE / COURT OF APPEAL

EUR 100 000

(3 168 000 UAH)

Order amount reported by the customer. Court award: 100 000 EUR (3 168 000 UAH).

ОСОБА_1 → M. S. Ahafonov

15.10.2025
Contract terminated. Repayment ordered.
COURT RULING

Full text · document No. 131028646

01Official records02Court documents03Parties’ positionsAbout

01 / Reviews

What the documents confirm

A repayment judgment, Czech proceedings and a separate claim by HAVN.

MODODOMUS

The Ukrainian judgment concerns Ahafonov’s obligations. The Czech proceedings concern MODODOMUS s.r.o. Each case has its own defendant, amount and procedural status.

See legal entities

02 / MODODOMUS

From payment to court decisions

The Ukrainian case and Czech proceedings. A source for every event.

Source library
  1. Contract for MODODOMUS S168

    Delivery was due on 25 August 2022. The court confirmed an advance payment of 100 000 EUR (3 168 000 UAH).

    Kharkiv Court of Appeal · No. 131028646 S11
  2. Appeal upheld repayment

    Termination of the contract and the principal award were upheld.

    Kharkiv Court of Appeal · No. 131028646 S11
  3. Cassation remitted additional claims

    The late-payment penalty, contractual fine, inflation losses and interest are being reconsidered. Repayment of the principal was not overturned.

    Supreme Court · No. 953/5664/22 S04
  4. Proceedings opened in Czechia

    Insolvency proceedings opened against MODODOMUS s.r.o., IČO 17190363.

    Obchodní věstník · OV12227522 S02
  5. Rehearing in Poltava

    The order gives 25 November 2026 as the hearing date. This is the next scheduled date as of 5 November.

    Poltava Court of Appeal · No. 140920470 S15

Four questions before paying

Before paying
01

Who are you paying?

Match the recipient’s name and registration number to the contract.

02

What is promised in writing?

Record the specifications, stages and delivery deadline.

03

What proves progress?

Ask for documents and an opportunity to inspect your own order.

04

What if delivery is late?

Check refund terms and dispute resolution arrangements.

No guesswork. The facts.

What did the court establish?

The appeal court confirmed payment of 100 000 EUR (3 168 000 UAH) and the contractor’s non-performance. It upheld termination and the principal award.

Kharkiv Court of Appeal · No. 131028646 S11
Did the Supreme Court overturn repayment?

No. The ruling of 1 July 2026 set aside the parts concerning the late-payment penalty, fine, inflation losses and 3% annual interest. Termination and the 100 000 EUR (3 168 000 UAH) principal award were not among the parts set aside.

Supreme Court · No. 953/5664/22 S04
Has the money actually been returned?

According to the customer, the money has still not been returned. The court terminated the contract and ordered Ahafonov to repay 100 000 EUR (3 168 000 UAH). Non-payment after the judgment is reported by the customer.

What is the status in Czechia?

The MODODOMUS s.r.o. case opened on 31 August 2026. As of 5 November, ISIR lists the stage before a determination of insolvency.

ISIR · MODODOMUS s.r.o. S01

An opinion can be challenged. A document can be checked.

Source library