S01
ISIR · MODODOMUS s.r.o.
Case KSPL 56 INS 15608/2026. Status: before a determination of insolvency.
Open source ↗MODODOMUS / Reviews
Every fact has a source.
Official records, copies of rulings, customer statements and company materials are distinguished. Access date: 5 November 2026.
20 of 20 sources
S02
Obchodní věstník · OV12227522
Records provisional administrator Horizont ISPL v.o.s. and the opening of proceedings on 31 August 2026.
Open source ↗S03
Obchodní věstník · OV12319808
Publication on changes in ownership, with MODODOMUS s.r.o. details and information on the proceedings.
Open source ↗S04
Supreme Court · No. 953/5664/22
Cassation set aside penalties and additional amounts. Contract termination and the 100 000 EUR (3 168 000 UAH) principal award were not set aside. Copy on iPlex.
Open source ↗S05
Protocol · case No. 953/5664/22
Second copy of the same ruling, not another case. The service’s heading uses «ВССУ»; the text identifies the Supreme Court.
Open source ↗S06
Mododomus Review · HAVN’s account
The publisher is HAVN; public contact: eugene@havn.world. The company reports a house-delivery dispute; its claim amount is its own calculation.
Open source ↗S07
Trustpilot · mododomus.com profile
Additional channel for reviews. Reposts of one account must not be counted as separate cases.
Open source ↗S08
Mododomus Cyprus · Privacy Policy
Identifies the website operator as MODODOMUS CYPRUS LIMITED, HE 448513. This is the company’s own policy.
Open source ↗S09
Mododomus Cyprus · house offering
Advertises modular houses and a three-month timeframe. Advertising does not prove performance of individual contracts.
Open source ↗S10
Opendatabot · ТОВ «МОДОДОМУС»
Entity code 43898405 found. Full record inaccessible through the viewing tool; obtain a current extract and compare with the contract.
Open source ↗S11
Kharkiv Court of Appeal · No. 131028646
Full text on Opendatabot. Confirms payment and non-performance; upholds termination and repayment of 100 000 EUR (3 168 000 UAH). Additional amounts were later reviewed on cassation.
Open source ↗S12
Data-UA · parties in case No. 953/5664/22
Proceedings No. 22-ц/818/1953/25. Names the defendant as Агафонов Максим Сергійович in public metadata. This dossier identifies the claimant as ОСОБА_1.
Open source ↗S13
Opendatabot · case No. 953/5664/22 history
Confirms Ahafonov’s involvement and includes subsequent Poltava Court of Appeal documents.
Open source ↗S14
Poltava Court of Appeal · No. 139333723
Confirms transfer from Kharkiv to Poltava and a rehearing scheduled for 25 November 2026.
Open source ↗S15
Poltava Court of Appeal · No. 140920470
Permits the claimant’s representative to participate by video. Again gives 25 November 2026 as the hearing date.
Open source ↗S16
760/9353/22 · Judgment: 14 July 2025
Separate case 760/9353/22. On 14 July 2025, Kyiv’s Holosiivskyi District Court terminated the contract and awarded repayment of the advance, penalties and inflation losses.
Open source ↗S17
760/9353/22 · Clerical corrections: 30 September 2025
The official register records 18 August 2025 as the date the main judgment entered into force. An order of 30 September 2025 corrected debtor details and clerical errors without changing the amounts; it also confirms that a writ of execution was issued on 18 September 2025. Issuing a writ does not itself establish recovery of the money.
Open source ↗S18
760/9353/22 · Public record of the parties
The defendant is sole trader Maksym Ahafonov. Judgment 128896861 identifies him as ОСОБА_2; the public proceedings record supplies his name. We refer to the claimant as ОСОБА_1. This is a different case and customer from case 953/5664/22: anonymised labels apply only within each case.
Open source ↗S19
760/9353/22 · Costs appeal: 24 February 2026
A supplementary judgment of 24 October 2025 awarded UAH 43,980 in legal costs and refused reimbursement of a UAH 207,732.60 success fee. Kyiv Court of Appeal upheld that supplementary judgment on 24 February 2026. On 20 April 2026, the Supreme Court refused to open cassation proceedings on that costs dispute. These acts did not review the main UAH 4,154,652 award.
Open source ↗S20
760/9353/22 · Costs cassation: 20 April 2026
A supplementary judgment of 24 October 2025 awarded UAH 43,980 in legal costs and refused reimbursement of a UAH 207,732.60 success fee. Kyiv Court of Appeal upheld that supplementary judgment on 24 February 2026. On 20 April 2026, the Supreme Court refused to open cassation proceedings on that costs dispute. These acts did not review the main UAH 4,154,652 award.
Open source ↗No results. Change the search or source type.
Links lead to third-party websites; content and availability may change. S04 and S05 are copies of one ruling, not two separate cases.